The Commission on Capital Cases updates thisinformation regularly. This information, however, is subject to change and maynot reflect the latest status of an inmate’s case and should not be relied uponfor statistical or legal purposes.
LUKEHART, Andrew Richard
DC# 391485
DOB: 04/10/73
Fourth Judicial Circuit, Duval County, Case# 96-2645 CFA
Sentencing Judge: The Honorable William A. Wilkes
Trial Attorneys: Michael Edwards – Private
Attorney, Direct Appeal: Chet Kaufman – Assistant PublicDefender
Attorney, Collateral Appeals: Michael P. Reiter – Registry
Date of Offense: 02/25/96
Date of Sentence: 04/04/97
Circumstances of the Offense:
At the time of the offense, Andrew Richard Lukehart livedwith his girlfriend, Misty Rhue and her two children, Ashley (a two-year-old)and Gabrielle (a five-month-old). On the afternoon of 02/25/96, Ms. Rhueput Ashley down for a nap in her bedroom, while Lukehart remained in the otherroom with Gabrielle. Around 5 p.m., Ms. Rhue heard her car start and she sawLukehart drive away in her white Oldsmobile. She also noticed thatGabrielle was not in the house.
Thirty minutes later Ms. Rhue received a call from Lukehart.He stated that an individual in a Blue Chevy Blazer had taken the child fromthe home and he was chasing them in her car. He asked her to call the police.After 20 minutes, Ms. Rhue called the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Department. Atapproximately 6:00 p.m., Mr. Mobley, a witness, reported to the Clay CountySheriff’s Department that a car had run off the road close to his home and hecould not find the driver. While an officer from the Jacksonville Sheriff’sDepartment was speaking with Ms. Rhue in her home, she received a call from theClay County Sheriff’s Department. The officer relayed the information that Ms.Rhue’s car had been driven off the road in Clay County, and no one was in thecar at the time it was located.
A search ensued in the surrounding area and neither the babynor driver was found. Helicopters were used in the search, and their presencealerted Mr. Davis, an off duty Florida State Trooper who lived near the area.He went outside and found Lukehart in his front yard. Lukehart walked up toTrooper Davis with his hands up and stated, “I’m the one they are looking for.Read me my rights.” Trooper Davis was not completely abreast of the situation,and he chose to handcuff Lukehart and then notified his dispatcher. An officerfrom the Clay County Sheriff’s office retrieved Lukehart and took him back tothe scene of the abandoned car. The officer kept Lukehart handcuffed and waitedfor an officer from Jacksonville’s Sheriff’s department to interview himbecause he was the only witness to the alleged abduction.
During this period of time, Lukehart made numerous commentsto the officers, such as complaining about Gabrielle soiling her diaper, andwanted to know when he could tell his side of the story. Lukehart stated thathe had placed Gabrielle in the front seat of the Oldsmobile in front of Ms.Rhue’s house and that she had been abducted from the driveway. Lukehart couldnot describe the person who was driving the Blazer.
The police questioned Lukehart at the police station, and hereiterated his second abduction story. Lukehart then stated that he wouldretrace his steps from Ms. Rhue’s home to the area in Clay County with lawenforcement. Lukehart acquiesced that his first story was a lie. He then statedthat the baby had been abducted from a store when he went inside to buy Ms.Rhue and the child some roses. When at the store, the detectives saw that thedetails of the story were inaccurate, and Lukehart changed his story. Lukehartthen took the police to the place where the Oldsmobile had been found and toldthem that was where he had lost the Blazer.
An intensive search was still being conducted for the child.The detective questioned Lukehart again and told him that he did not believethe abduction story. Approximately 18 hours after turning himself in, Lukehartfinally admitted to killing the baby. He stated that had he dropped the childwhile changing her diaper and put her body in a pond in Jacksonville.
Trial Summary:
03/07/96 Defendant indicted on the following chargers:
Count I: First-Degree Murder
Count II: Aggravated ChildAbuse
03/08/96 Defendant was arraigned. Defendant stood mute and the court entered a plea ofnot guilty for him.
05/29/96 Public Defender, Lewis Buzzell III, entered a motion to withdraw as counsel
06/06/96 Order allowing the public defender to withdraw and appointing new attorney,Michael Edwards
02/27/97 The Defendant was found guilty on both counts.
03/14/97 The jury recommended the death penalty by a vote of nine to three.
04/04/97 Defendant was sentenced as follows:
Count I: First-Degree Murder – Death
Count II: Aggravated ChildAbuse – 15 years, to run concurrent to Count I
Appeal Summary:
Florida Supreme Court – Direct Appeal
FSC# 90,507
776 So. 2d 906
05/12/97 Appeal filed
06/22/00 Original opinion issued
09/28/00 Revised opinion issued. FSC affirmed the conviction and sentence
01/23/01 Rehearing denied
02/26/01 Mandate issued
United States Supreme Court – Petition for Writ ofCertiorari
USSC# 00-9578
121 S. Ct. 2561
04/20/01 Petition filed
06/25/01 Petition denied
State Circuit Court – 3.850 Motion
CC# 96-2645 CFA
09/27/01 Motion filed
06/20/02 Amended filed
09/23/03 Second Amended filed
04/06/09 Motion denied
Florida Supreme Court – 3.850 Appeal
FSC# 09-961
(Pending)
06/08/09 Appeal filed
Florida Supreme Court – Petition for Writ of HabeasCorpus
FSC# 09-1788
(Pending)
09/23/09 Petition filed
Factors Contributing to the Delay in Execution ofSentence:
The Direct Appeal was pending in the Florida Supreme Courtfor three years before a decision was rendered.
Case Information:
Lukehart filed a Direct Appeal on 03/12/97 to the FloridaSupreme Court. The Court issued an opinion on 06/22/00. The originalopinion was withdrawn on 09/28/00 due to the fact that Justice Quince had torecuse herself. Prior to her appointment to the Florida Supreme Court, JusticeQuince had spoken with the Assistant Public Defender handling the directappeal, Chet Kaufman, about the case. A revised opinion was issued on 09/28/00.The Court affirmed the convictions of first-degree murder and aggravatedchild-abuse, and the death sentence, but they remanded the case forresentencing on the aggravated child abuse conviction. The main claim ofthe appeal was the trial court’s denial to suppress statements made by Lukehartto law enforcement officers. Lukehart claimed that the statements were notvoluntarily made. The Court found no error in the trial court’s denial tosuppress the statements. Due to the fact that the trial court failed to fillout the sentencing guidelines score sheet, the Court remanded the case forresentencing and directed the trial court to properly complete the guidelinesscore sheet. The rehearing was denied on 01/23/01 and the mandate was issued on02/26/01.
Lukehart filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to theUnites Stated Supreme Court on 04/20/01, which was denied on 06/25/01.
Lukehart filed a 3.850 Motion to the Circuit Court on09/27/01. An amended motion was filed on 06/20/02 and a second amendedmotion was filed on 09/23/03. On 04/06/09, this 3.850 Motion was deniedin the Circuit Court.
On 06/08/09, Lukehart filed a 3.850 Appeal to the FloridaSupreme Court. This appeal is pending.
Lukehart filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on09/23/09. This petition is currently pending.
________________________________________________________________________
Report Date: 12/14/01 NMP
Approved: 12/20/01 WS
Updated: 04/12/10 EMJ